Aquarius New Moon - February 17, 2007
I've never truly understood the sign of Aquarius. One the one hand, it concerns friends, groups, and concern for the collective. On the other hand, the Aquarian is eccentric, striving to separate from the mainstream, upsetting the status quo in her embrace of unique beliefs, fashion statements and public acts. Aquarius is forward-thinking, often embracing trends before these radical ideas are adopted by the consumer-capitalist corporate-state.Aquarius is detached from the emotional connections that bring two individuals together in intimate embrace. The Water Bearer is an air sign that, unlike his brother Libra, is not all that into one-on-one partnership; and unlike Gemini, isn't all that interested in chatting with the neighbors about the latest goings-on.
Is Aquarius the mad scientist, locked in his laboratory or study, developing his brilliant but misunderstood ideas about the nature of the Universe? Or is Aquarius that woman who has a billion friends, who's heavily involved in political activism and building an online presence for her favorite political candidate?
Aquarius is so impersonal, yet at the same time, he cares so much about humanity. Everyone should be treated equally. All beings should have basic human rights. Yet when you try to get close to Aquarius, he backs away. He's more comfortable in the global sister- and brotherhood than the forming of a more perfect union with one other person.
Aquarius is a transpersonal sign. It's not about the selfish needs of the developing self. It's not about closeness between two people. It's about all of us, the world. When I look at the google search queries that bring users to my web site, I notice a number of users type "I hate Aquarius men" into that search box. Are these googlers trying to find consolation, other poor souls who have tried -- and tried -- to get close to an Aquarius, only to be emotionally shut out? I'm making a grand generalization here -- because of course Aquarians are capable of marriage -- but there's something about this sign that is beyond ordinary human relations.
Barack Obama just announced his candidacy for President of the United States, based on a platform that all people should be afforded equal rights, all citizens should get universal health care. I haven't made any decision yet about who I'm voting for, but obviously, during ObamaMania, we can begin this Aquarian enterprise by engaging in political action to ensure that everyone -- regardless of skin color, gender, ability, sexual orientation, and so on -- gets treated with respect and can derive the benefits of living in a first world country that can afford to take care of its neediest.
This is not a forward-thinking idea. It's a big "duh." But apparently there are many numbskulls running this country who haven't yet entered the Age of Aquarius.


4 Comments:
You understand Aquarius more than you think you do. You hit me exactly. I'm involved in political activities, Kinship ( a group to support family members who are raising other children). I have tons of friends but I have to force myself to go nextdoor for coffee with my neighbor once a week. I failed marrage 101 but have no desire to repeat the course. So I live alone with my granddaughter I'm raising and my 4 cats.
Jeffrey, think about it.
The Aquarian must be an outsider/nonconformist to see what needs to be fixed, yet feel a deep concern for the group to prompt action.
You're doing great work. I hope you don't mind that I quote you regularly.
Marge
Coming of Age in the Aquarian
Marge,
I feel validated when you quote me regularly, especially alongside Ms. Miller.
Your comment is helpful. Only outsiders can clearly see what is wrong with society.
Aquarius..."cares so much about humanity. Everyone should be treated equally. All beings should have basic human rights. " Dick Cheny(born January 20, 1941? An Aquarian who cares? Is humanitarian? Cares about human rights? You must be joking.
The Aquarians I know certainly are "involved" in political and community action, but the feeling one gets its that it boils down to them and something narcissistic, and not about whatever the cause they purport to be invested in.
Self aggrandisement is something they are great at: Think Oprah and her big thing about her fancy school in South africa--was it for the poor kids or was it all about Oprah?
I've worked with a lot of causes, and in my experience Aquarians are riveting when it comes to capturing everyone's attention but they don't deliver. There is something very insubstantial about them which is often interpreted as their originality--lots of high faluting idealistic talk--often very convincing, but when push comes to shove nothing that can be delivered, accomplished or legitimized as being for the greater good. As you can tell, they are not my favorite sign!
Post a Comment
Get email updates when new comments are added to this post
(There must be at least one comment already posted for this to work.)
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home